Now, a story about a toy that brings such joy to the hearts of many teenage boys. It’s called an bb gun. And for those of you who are not teenage boys, I’ll explain. They’re BB guns that shoot plastic pellets, and part of the fun is that they’re designed to look as real as possible. So real, in fact, that police officers and teachers and just about everyone else can’t always tell the difference between the toy and the real thing. Visit http://federal-firearms-license.net for more on cheap bb guns.

It was hot, the last day of school. Water balloons and shaving cream were flying across Main Street in Newman, California. Lieutenant Don Hutchins(ph) was on his bike patrolling when things turned. A frantic older woman pulled up and said she was worried about a kid in a car.

She tells us the type of car it is, with a bunch male juveniles in it, and one of them had a gun.

It took them less than four minutes to find him, a 15-year-old in the driver’s seat waving a Beretta ’96 handgun, pointing it out the window. Another officer, Sergeant Limus(ph), yelled, drop the weapon.

We both drew our service weapons, pointed at the kid, telling him to drop the weapon, drop the weapon.

The kid turned towards Sergeant Limus. His gun turned with him, and it was that second, one second, Sergeant Limus readying his finger just as his eye spotted a tiny dot of orange on the barrel of the gun. It made him hesitate just for a second, and the kid dropped his weapon. It was a toy.

If he would have pointed that at us, or at anybody else for that matter, he would have been probably deceased at this point.

In Arkansas, a 12-year-old boy wasn’t so lucky. He was walking outside his apartment complex with a replica toy gun and was shot and killed by police. Young people have been killed in similar circumstances in at least three other states, too.

bb are the hottest new kind of toy replica guns. They shoot lightweight plastic BBs and they have a bright orange tip, but the tips are pretty easy to break off or paint over, which happens a lot. So there are problems with the toys. But of course, those problems exist because people, especially young people, especially boys, adore them. So before you write bb off or petition to ban the guns, let’s just see the other side, the pure joy of play.

I am totally pumped coming off the field. I go over and join the eliminated players on the porch, where Eric’s mom is fanning herself next to the snacks. Rebecca Deal is here, hosting a nine-hour-battle, but she does have mixed feelings about toy guns, always has. Shooting fun for kids with bb guns at home.

When my children were little, we had rules. You don’t shoot each other. We could shoot monsters, aliens, dinosaurs and robots because they weren’t real. So then comes bb, and all of those rules were blown out of the water.

She saw how bb drew her shy, quiet son out of the house and away from video games towards friends. So now she’s OK with bb in her backyard, but should she let him play at other kids’ houses? What if no one tells the neighbors there are a bunch of kids with real-looking guns running around?

At the moment, there aren’t many organized venues for kids to play bb, so it’s kind of up to parents to make these decisions. Eric and Don finish up the round, winners, and join us on the porch. I start to tell them about Newman, California, that boy who was almost killed by the police, and before I’m even finished, Don starts shaking his head. He knows those kinds of kids.

They act like they’re gangsters. They put the gun sideways and point it at random cars or something like that. It just ruins it because then like – like law enforcement will think about banning this toy just because of that one situation.

Some school districts and cities have already banned replica guns like bb, and the Newman Police Department now wants to see a federal ban. The chief there sums the issue up this way: Young people see bb guns as toys. They’re pretending. They don’t realize, he says, we are not.

Gun Safe Reviews For A New Age

Today, the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission called on the gun industry to develop uniform safety standards for gun locks. The commission tested the locks and found that most were ineffective. The safety commission also announced a voluntary recall of defective locks that were distributed last year by police departments and paid for by a gun industry trade group. We recommend visiting federal-firearms-license.net for more information on gun safe reviews.

While there is disagreement over whether safety locks should be mandatory or voluntary, gun locks are generally the vanilla ice cream of the gun control debate. Both sides like locks as part of any safety program aimed at keeping guns out of kids’ hands. But there are no uniform standards for safety locks, whether it’s the trigger lock device or a cable system, which threads through an open chamber or empty magazine and into a padlock.

The federal Consumer Product Safety Commission recently lab-tested a broad cross-section of the locks out there–32 models in all–and the results were not encouraging, says commission Chairwoman Ann Brown.

What we found was quite frightening. We found that many of these gun locks didn’t do what they were supposed to do. They didn’t work. Some of the gun locks could have worked–could be opened with a paper clip or a pair of tweezers. Some of them could just be opened by just whacking them on a table. That’s not the deterrent that a parent can count on. In fact, if I can open the gun locks that easily, any five-year-old can.

Brown says the tests underscore the need for national gun lock standards, and the gun industry is already working with a standards-setting organization to come up with a voluntary code. By law, the safety commission is not allowed to regulate firearms, but gun locks are consider an accessory, so safety officials believe they do have oversight power. Brown says the commission will act if the industry doesn’t move fast enough or if the standards aren’t tough enough.

Toys have 12 different safety regulations, but gun locks have none, and so, certainly, gun locks need a safety regulation. See the best gun safes here.

Obviously, a law should not be easily defeated. And the idea that locks should be tested against standards is something that the gun industry has endorsed.

Attorney Jeff Ray of gunmaker Beretta is on an industry committee on lock standards. They’ve already submitted draft standards to the American National Standards Institute. Ray believes the industry can come up with its own set of guidelines that are reasonable and thoughtful. And Ray worries that federal and state government-imposed standards could be too restrictive on law-abiding adults.

One of the concerns that we have is with states that might mandate that no gun may be sold without a lock, and then setting standards that are so stringent that no law could comply. And what you have when you do that is basically de facto gun control.

The safety commission denies that its standards push is a backdoor effort at gun control. More than 90 percent of new firearms sold today include some form of external safety locking device. The industry says there are no reported cases of injuries, accidents or shootings attributed to defective gun locks.

The safety commission is working closely with the Shooting Sports Foundation to voluntarily recall some 400,000 gun locks that were distributed last year through local police and paid for by the industry trade group. The foundation has redesigned the lock with the commission’s help, and they’re replacing the defective ones with a stronger version free of charge. Shooting Sports Foundation director Doug Painter warns that no lock is foolproof. He says locks should be part of a broader safety effort.

Whether it’s the medicines you’re storing, the pool you have in your back yard, you take certain precautions. Keep the gun unloaded, put the lock on it, secure it in a safe place, store the ammunition in a separate area under lock and key. And the combination of these precautions can create a very safe environment.

New lock standards could be announced in the next six months. In the meantime, the sports foundation recently received a $5 million federal grant through the Department of Justice to expand its Project Homesafe program to distribute free gun locks to 300 more communities across the country.

Learn more at http://federal-firearms-license.net.

Gun Safes For Increased Security In The Home

Gun Safes Keep Your Weapons Secure

Weapon safety protestors have been pushing states to need background checks at gun shows. The group, Americans for Gun Essential safety, was successful in assisting to close the so-called gun program loophole in Oregon and Colorado. Today, the group releases a study that draws a direct relationship between gun program loopholes and guns used in crimes. Jim Kessler is policy and analysis director for the Americans for Gun Security Base. Visit federal-firearms-license.net for more on gun safes.

Mr. JIM KESSLER (Policy and Analysis Director, Americans for Gun Essential safety Basis): We identified that states that have actually not closed the gun program loophole, they’re swamping the nation by having criminal offense guns, that’s first. Amount two, we located considerable proof that offenders are exploiting this loophole in the law to get guns at gun programs. And three, and this is, I think, particularly good news, when you call for background checks at gun programs, it will not impact genuine gun show business at all. In fact, three of the 5 states that host the most gun shows in the nation have currently closed the gun program loophole by requiring background checks there.

EDWARDS: Loophole meaning some states call for background checks, others don’t?

Mr. KESSLER: Just. Under federal law, anybody purchasing a gun at a gun outlet must go through a background check. However exclusive sales between people, there’s no federal law requiring background checks. And what happens is at gun shows, it’s a sizable grouping of both exclusive vendors and gun shops that come collectively in one spot. In 32 states where they have not passed extra laws, those private vendors can easily purchase and offer without undergoing a background check.

EDWARDS: Now you would think the gun programs would go to states where background checks are not required.

Mr. KESSLER: Well, just what we identified is that there actually is no distinction in the number of gun programs between states that have closed the gun program loophole and states that have not. In fact, set up already this year in states that have actually not closed the gun show loophole, 24 gun programs per state; in states that have actually closed the gun show loophole, 22. There is a little particular niche of offenders who have discovered this loophole and they’re making use of that. Store your weapons in a gun cabinet for additional safety.

EDWARDS: So gun shows are still happening in states that need background checks however are those programs losing online business?

Mr. KESSLER: There’s no proof that they’re losing business. In fact, Pennsylvania has the 2nd most gun shows in the country. They need background checks. There’s a prospering gun program company there. It’s just that crooks aren’t getting guns there. I mean, most of the buying that’s going on is not criminal acquiring.

EDWARDS: So where’s the worst state in your estimation?

Mr. KESSLER: Mississippi, Texas, Georgia, Florida– they are the four leading criminal offense gun exporting states. They are states that do not call for background checks. Their guns are winding up all over the country in the hands of criminals.

EDWARDS: Aren’t the guns accessible at gun shows more challenging to trace and, for that reason, this could possibly mess up your study in some fashion?

Mr. KESSLER: There’s constraints to gun tracing. Tracing basically simply goes back to the original sale. However we do know, first off, that federal law enforcement and their gun trafficking investigations have discovered that it’s the second leading source of illegal guns. But the other point is it’s kind of like cigarette smoking years ago. Individuals who were getting lung cancer were smoking cigarettes. Criminal offense guns are stemming from states where extremely background checks are not needed at gun shows. It’s a frustrating correlation there that’s really indisputable.

Check out http://federal-firearms-license.net for more.

Conversation and Recommendations For Your FFL

States differ greatly in the presence and comprehensiveness of their laws for the licensing and oversight of FFL dealers. Several states enforce little or no regulation of dealers. Others have actually taken a detailed technique. And still others enforce a hodgepodge of stipulations that are likely to make it difficult for law enforcement to discourage some gun dealers from illegally diverting firearms to criminals.

Some might argue that dealers are currently certified at the federal level and that state licensing is for that reason not needed. Sadly, the federal licensing system has not proven to be an entirely effective ways of policing the country’s gun dealers. The federal Firearm Owners Protection Act, enacted in 1986, limited the ATF to one unannounced examination of firearm dealers per year, (37) enforced a higher criterion of proof for specific abuses, and weakened penalties. And in practice, it has shown extremely difficult to revoke a dealer’s federal license. For example, one dealer was 1st charged with violating federal gun laws in 1996, and by 2003 had actually collected more than 900 federal law violations. In May 2004, ATF finally issued a notice of license revocation, yet the dealer was able to proceed selling guns through February 2006. (38)

State dealer licensing are able to, for that reason, be a required linchpin upon which to base a detailed and successful system for avoiding large-scale diversion of firearms into the improper market. Close to all firearms that are used in crimes were 1st sold at retail by firearm dealers. The strategy that state or town governments should control who is enabled to sell a potentially unsafe product such as firearms, and under what conditions, is not a radical one. A beneficial analogy is the sale of narcotics and additional prescription medications which, if not appropriately managed, can drastically harm the public’s health. Although (as by having firearms) the federal authorities regulates the sale of prescribed medicines, states also play an important function in the licensing and oversight of pharmacies and pharmacologists. In fact, a lot of states license online business, such as hair beauty salons, that pose far less risk to the public’s wellness.

ffl

As of August 2006, nevertheless, 2 invoices were pending in Congress that will actually make oversight of gun dealers more difficult. HR 5005 might make it a great deal harder for law enforcement to acquire and share info determining the gun dealers disproportionately responsible for guns traced to crime. (39) The invoice might prohibit ATF from offering firearm trace data to local governments, besides information particular to that jurisdiction for use in an authentic criminal inspection. HR 5005 might effectively protect against jurisdictions like New York City, whose crime guns largely emerge in other places, from sharing their trace facts by having others to let a synchronized enforcement approach. Federal-firearms-license.net said It would shield scofflaw gun dealers from simply the kind of examination that has actually proven effective. HR 5092 might call for proof that a gun dealer deliberately intended to breach the law before a federal license can be revoked, and then just for “serious” violations. (40) The bill does not take into account record keeping violations to be serious, although they are a marker for off-the-books transactions to offenders. In addition, HR 5092 might reduce the penalties for specific gun sales abuses.

Based on our assessment and analysis of state dealer licensing and oversight laws, we provide the subsequent suggestions in the interest of lessening the dangers that some gun dealers can easily pose for the public’s wellness.

\* States should license gun dealers. Although federal law calls for a dealer’s license, by also mandating a state license, neighborhood authorities need not count on federal officials to supply needed oversight. The threat of license revocation by state or local officials can easily provide an essential device for law enforcement and a wanted enticement for compliance for some dealers.

\* Conditions are needed to guarantee that only qualified individuals obtain a license. At a minimum, these ought to feature a criminal history background check that consists of fingerprints. Other proper conditions include a minimal age requirement. Background checks ought to even be carried out for all staff members, especially those involved in the direct sale of firearms.

\* State law ought to mandate dealer record keeping and retention. This is needed to ensure that a dealer is able to account for his or her merchandise. Records should be completely kept.

\* States ought to require routine inspection of dealers. Although some police departments routinely inspect dealers as a matter of practice, when state laws mandate inspections they are more most likely to really happen. The ATF does not presently have the websites to frequently inspect a lot of gun dealers.

\* States really should impose mandatory theft reporting by dealers. Once more, this serves to guarantee that a dealer can easily be held accountable for his or her inventory.

\* Shop security demands really should consist of regulations needing that merchandise be locked up when not being shown to a consumer. Measures like this can make it less most likely that multitudes of guns will be taken at one time.

\* States must enforce each of these laws. Merely having a law on the publications, without appropriate enforcement, is inefficient. In the states that already have some or all of our suggested laws, there is an opportunity to address unlawful gun trafficking through more desirable enforcement, without the need to enact new laws.

Each of these recommendations is currently law in one or even more states. We acknowledge, of course, that there could be political barriers to enacting these laws in some additional states. However, in lots of spots, gun dealers could be a less potent political force than gun owners. And none of these suggestions will directly affect law-abiding gun managers. The implementation of a few of these measures, even in states not customarily seen as favorable for gun control such as South Carolina and Georgia, provides added hope that development can easily be made in other states as well. If Congress were to enact HR5005 or 5092, it might become even more important for states to implement right oversight and enforcement of their firearm dealers. That mayors exemplifying cities in numerous states by having multitudes of gun owners (for instance, Dallas, Houston, Little Rock, Tulsa, Louisville, Atlanta, Richmond, Raleigh, Denver, and Salt Lake City) are coordinating to advance measures to prevent prohibited gun trafficking provides some cause for optimism that our recommendations can be more widely accepted.

Insights On The FFL License For Selling Weapons

Having acquired the laws, we then grouped their components into seven categories. These categories were as follows.

\* State firearm dealer’s license laws. In some states, dealers’ licenses are released by state-wide authorities (such as the state police); in others, neighborhood authorities issue the license. Each was featured in our analysis as long as a license was mandated under state law, despite the issuing authority. Visit http://federal-firearms-license.net/ for more information on the ffl license.

\* The conditions, if any type of, needed to obtain a license. Examples of conditions feature criminal history background checks and minimal age demands. Needing background checks or additional conditions for a license can easily guarantee that just qualified individuals keep and preserve a license.

\* Gun sales record keeping laws. Gun sales records are vital due to the fact that they permit police or additional inspectors to examine a dealer’s inventory by having his or her records to identify any sort of off-the-books transactions or other inconsistencies.

\* Whether (and how long) such records must be maintained by the dealers. Likewise, needing records to be maintained for a reasonable time period guarantees that dealers remain responsible, and that police can recognize criminal offense guns that were offered unlawfully also years before a criminal offense was executed.

Get your ffl license

\* State laws enabling or mandating the inspection of dealers. Under federal law, the ATF is restricted to one regular inspection of firearm dealers per year. (23) And in fact, the majority of dealers are checked far less frequently. (24) State laws permitting evaluation let police or others to contrast a dealer’s stock with his or her sales records on a routine basis, without calling for proof that some crime has occurred. Inspections can additionally find additional violations of state law that may typically be missed out on, such as compliance with shop protection requirements (see below). Laws mandating evaluation make it more very likely that those inspections will in fact take place.

\* Essential reporting of stolen guns. Obligatory fraud reporting is necessary since corrupt dealers that have actually assisted in illegal transactions could later falsely report (when their online business records are inspected for inconsistencies, for example) that those guns were merely “taken.”

\* Outlet protection requirements produced to prevent firearm fraud. These include laws requiring that guns be locked-up after hours. By definition, guns taken directly from accredited dealers immediately get in the prohibited market. Get approved for your license to sell guns by using a quality FFL kit.

There are, of course, additional laws relevant to firearm dealers, consisting of hanging around durations and stipulations on the types of guns that are able to be sold. We do not consist of these as not strictly entailing licensing and oversight of dealers. We even do not feature laws suitable just to the sale of guns at gun shows.

We next searched for patterns among these laws, and determined those states that had the most extensive regulative schemes, those by having the weakest oversight of gun dealers, and opportunities for enhancement. For each state, we counted the number of our seven categories of dealer regulation that were included in state law. These were mapped using ArcMap9.1 software application (ESRI, Inc. 1999-2005) to determine regional distinctions. We conclude by having recommendations, based on analysis and experience, for a set of dealer licensing and oversight laws most very likely to decrease unlawful gun trafficking.

Outcomes

Table 2 summarizes the laws appropriate to dealer licensing and oversight. Just seventeen states need firearm dealers, as a matter of state law, to get a license (see Table 1). Many of these states– for instance those in the northeastern US– have actually customarily controlled firearms more solely. Nevertheless, additional states needing a dealer’s license feature Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Virginia– states by having typically less restrictive gun laws. Each of these states is also an essential source state for guns that are subsequently recovered from criminals in a number of northeastern towns. (25)

6 states calling for a dealer’s license impose couple of, if any sort of, conditions to get the license. In these states, the licensing requirement appears to be wanted, in part, to produce revenue through a charge system. Other states, though, enforce a comprehensive set of requirements featuring: minimal age, background check provisions, fingerprinting, checks of citizenship, and psychological wellness history checks.

Simply over fifty percent of the states (n = 26) need dealers to keep gun sales records. Of these, many (n = 23) mandate that the records be preserved for a specified duration. This varied from one year (in Tennessee (26)) to permanent retention of records in numerous states.

Almost fifty percent of the states (n = 23) clearly enable police evaluation of gun dealers as a matter of state law. However merely two states (Massachusetts (27) and Rhode Island (28)) need that those evaluations really happen on a routine basis– in Massachusetts annually and Rhode Island monthly.

Only 6 states (California, (29) Massachusetts, (30) Michigan, (31) New Jersey, (32) New York, (33) and Ohio (34)) require that thefts of stock from gun outlets be reported to neighborhood authorities, though this is also needed by federal law. Laws in these six states usually require that all frauds be reported within a specified time period. State reporting of frauds– as opposed to federally-mandated reporting– can let local officials to act more promptly to possibly minimize the harm associated with guns straight getting in the illicit market.

Shop security demands varied significantly among the thirteen states enforcing these guidelines. Some states just require that guns not be put in the window of the store where they might more quickly be subject to an impulsive theft (these are determined in Table 1 as “product placement”). Others (for example, California (35)) enforce a lot more comprehensive rules including securing machines, alarm systems, insurance requirements, and background checks of shop staff members.

In a preliminary effort to recognize the states by having the most thorough regulations, Figure 1 groups the states by precisely how many of our seven groups of laws each state had, by having states that license gun dealers suggested with a dark black border. The map likewise provides an opportunity to identify regional variants in the comprehensiveness of dealer licensing and oversight systems. As expected, states in the northeast and western Us had the largest number of laws in our seven categories. But there were even some surprises. federal-firearms-license.net has more on this. South Carolina, and to a somewhat lesser extent Georgia, additionally had detailed laws. Of course, simply counting whether a state had any law in a specific category blurs contrasts in restrictiveness. Nevertheless, the states with laws in all seven groups (California, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) are also usually concerned as having among the most extensive firearm law systems

Status Of The Federal Firearms License In The United States.

Firearms were connected with 30,136 fatalities in the Us in 2003; of these, 11,920 were homicides. (1) For every firearm homicide, there are 4 individuals that suffer non-fatal firearm assaults. (2) Like many other person items in the US, the majority of guns are at first offered to everyone through a network of retail dealers. (3) Individuals in the business of offering firearms need to acquire a federal firearm dealer’s license. (4) There were greater than 54,000 federally certified gun dealers in the Us in 2005, though this reflects a seventy-eight percent decrease since 1994. (5) Some states additionally require a state license to offer firearms. For help getting your federal firearms license visit federal-firearms-license.net. Often you are able to sell firearms from your home address.

Licensed firearm dealers are a very important source of guns for offenders and gun traffickers. In one analysis of gun trafficking inspections carried out by the Bureau of Liquor, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), certified dealers accounted for a plurality of all guns diverted to the prohibited market. (6) Persons by having a disqualifying criminal history are prohibited from buying or possessing firearms. (7) Yet some dealers are obviously willing to help in illegal sales or also sell straight to offenders. (8) A nationwide phone survey of retail gun dealers identified that more than fifty percent of the dealers were willing to make a “straw sale,” where one individual unlawfully purchases a gun wanted for another who is proscribed from possessing a firearm. (9)

A tiny percentage of all qualified dealers represent a bulk of the gun trafficking problem. In a 2000 ATF analysis, merely one percent of gun dealers sold more than half of all guns traced to crime. (10) The disproportionate supply of criminal offense guns by a tiny number of gun dealers can easily not be described entirely by high sales volume, spot criminal offense rates, or purchaser demographics. (11) However dealer sales practices and law enforcement oversight– unmeasured in previous researches– could describe a section of this variation.

Get Your Federal Firearms License

Just recently, law enforcement in some towns has actually begun to more carefully inquire into the practices of some licensed dealers. In combination by having legal actions filed by the towns of Chicago, Detroit, and Gary, Indiana, police conducted undercover stings of gun dealers presumed of making illegal sales, leading to many arrests. In the Chicago spot, the stings were connected with a forty-six percent decrease in the movement of brand-new guns to criminals. (12) Likewise, following heightened law enforcement and public scrutiny, a sizable Milwaukee-area become a gun dealer announced that it would not offer Sunday evening unique handguns preferred with offenders. As a result, there was an overall forty-four percent decrease in the supply of newly trafficked guns to crooks in Milwaukee. (13)

In early 2006, a coalition of beyond fifty US mayors announced that they will combine to fight unlawful gun trafficking. (14) Just recently, New York City carried out stings of gun dealers located in a number of southern states, (15) based upon evidence that the bulk of the criminal offense guns found in New York Town were very first purchased from dealers away from state. (16) In these stings, many dealers were caught making illegal sales, and suits were brought against them by New York City. 2 of these complication dealers have actually concurred to settle the legal action by concurring to a special deal of brand-new sales practices and oversight produced to protect against illegal sales. (17) With all of this renewed attention, it is most likely that gun trafficking will definitely stay a vital issue for policy makers at the state and regional levels.

One prospective opportunity to lower the public wellness dangers connected with corrupt gun dealers is through licensing and oversight systems. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms issues federal dealer’s licenses. Unfortunately, federal laws regulating firearm dealers make it complicated to revoke the license of complication dealers, (18) and sources committed by ATF to firearm dealer oversight are modest. (19) As an outcome, very several firearm dealers face federal prosecution for breaching firearm sales laws. (20)

State licensing systems, nevertheless, are a considerably under-explored opportunity for firearm dealer oversight. When a state prefers to license its gun dealers, there is at least the option to enforce even more rigorous licensing and evaluation requirements than are mandated under federal law. Failure to comply lets the state to revoke a license should stay in online business. Licensing systems can easily likewise complement law enforcement efforts by offering an instant sanction– revocation of a license– when misconduct is determined.

But no peer-reviewed work reviews the several state licensing systems for firearm dealers. By recognizing and classifying these state systems, we recognize possibilities for states to intervene to protect against problem dealers from giving guns to offenders, juveniles, or gun traffickers.

Techniques

We applied legal analysis methods to recognize the law of each state relating to the licensing and oversight of gun dealers. We utilized legal data sources such as Lexis and West Law to acquire the complete words of all state legislative codes concerning gun dealers. We even recognized any sort of relevant state administrative regulations with a combination of these exact same lists, state authorities web sites, and local law collections. Finally, we examined secondary sources that put together many of this details, including a yearly publication by the ATF, (21) and appropriate internet sites including the Legal Community Against Violence online. (22) The laws and procedures are existing with the end of the 2004 state legislative sessions. These laws change slowly, if at all, and we are unaware of any type of major modifications to dealer licensing laws since then.

For more see http://federal-firearms-license.net.